Aid project in Pakistan stalls

ISLAMABAD,  Pakistan- A $46 million American development program in Pakistan's tribal regions along the Afghan border has made little progress since it was launched in 2008, according to a U.S.government audit.
The finding illustrates the challenges facing Washington as it tries to boost civilian aid there to blunt the appeal of al-Qaeda and the Taliban
.

The audit, dated Thursday and posted on the Web site of the U.S. Agency for International Development, found that "little real progress" toward the program's stated goals had been made in the first 22 months of the 36-month program. It said the program so far had spent only $15.5 million.

The program, audited by the office of the inspector general, was set up to strengthen government institutions and local aid groups in the tribal regions. It is to train staff, install computer systems, and run projects to ensure future aid money is spent more effectively.

The audit said work had been slowed by the deteriorating security situation in the northwest. All foreign staff working on U.S. government projects were withdrawn from the northwestern city of Peshawar after a U.S. aid worker was killed there in 2008, making work much more difficult.

It said a plan to install computers and train staff to use them at the tribal region's secretariat in Peshawar had barely gotten off the ground.

It noted that 340 of the 400 computers delivered there remained in boxes.

The audit did mention some successes for the program, such as the creation of a public outreach campaign promoting peace and 74 project and financial management training events held for 1,000 government workers.

The program is being run by Development Alternatives Inc., an American firm that won the contract offered by USAID.

In part the audit blamed a new U.S. government initiative to direct money through the Pakistani government and local aid groups, not foreign for-profit contractors such as DAI.

The shift is an effort to address local demands that as much money as possible is spent locally and thus stays in the country.

As a result of the new strategy, it said DAI did not know whether its contract would be terminated, and many key activities were put on hold.

The audit said the contractor had requested $15 million in June 2009 from the government to continue its work but was given $4.7 million.

In the border region yesterday, security forces battled extremists for a third day and the Pakistani government said 44 suspected insurgents were killed.

The clashes were taking place in Bajur, an area the Pakistani army declared free of extremists in early 2009 after a major offensive.

There was no independent confirmation of the fighting or the identities of the dead in Bajur, a tribal region where al-Qaeda and Taliban have long had a presence.

Pakistan has launched a series of operations against extremists in the tribal regions, pushing them back in some areas.

But the United States wants the army to continue pressing the fight because Taliban fighters in Afghanistan use the region as a base from which to attack NATO and U.S. forces.

It says stabilizing Pakistan and getting it to crack down on extremists in the northwest is key to success in Afghanistan, where Washington is sending 30,000 extra troops in a final attempt to turn around the war.

As well as urging force, the Obama administration has authorized the dispersal of $7.5 billion in development assistance from American taxpayers over the next five years to convince Pakistanis their interests are best served by the state, not by extremists.

Source:philly.com/

Pakistan’s Next Fight

NEW YORK – The terrorist sanctuary in the South Waziristan region of Pakistan’s tribal frontier with Afghanistan is coming apart. It took a while for the Pakistani Army to move against the region’s rising violence and chaos, but its campaign in South Waziristan is making progress.

The campaign’s immediate impact consists in Pakistan’s determination to establish its authority in the area. But the window for the military to fill the power vacuum will be open only briefly. The terrorists have shown before that they can take a punch, strike back, and even rebuild their networks.

Indeed, even as the Pakistani Army launched operation Rah-e-Nijat (Path to Salvation) in October, a dozen devastating terrorist attacks in Pakistan’s major cities demonstrated the reach of the South Waziristan militants. In a few instances, senior army and intelligence officers were targeted outside their homes in Islamabad, despite extensive security measures in and around the capital.

The October 11 attack on Army Headquarters in Rawalpindi was the most daring of all – and sent shudders across the military command, because the terrorists knew the layout of the military and security buildings. But this inside knowledge also worked against the militants, because it demonstrated what was at stake for the country at large. No large street protests against the military operation in South Waziristan have been reported from anywhere in Pakistan.

But success in South Waziristan is only the starting point for dealing with the problem. Militant hubs are scattered throughout the sparsely-populated tribal areas, including the North Waziristan, Orakzai, and Mohmand regions. Moreover, violent militancy has now spread into Pakistan proper. Southern Punjab is seeing a rapid growth in the number of religious fanatics, and rooting out the problem there is much more challenging than acting in the Pashtun tribal areas.

Many militants in Punjab worked closely with the Pakistani intelligence services for years, and their infrastructure is dispersed and hidden in various towns and villages. The Army, which recruits heavily in the Punjab, will not use force there in the way it is doing in the tribal areas. Only a concerted law-enforcement effort, with the full support of the intelligence services, can succeed in the Pakistani heartland.

The deep security crisis in Pakistan is mirrored across the border in Afghanistan, which offers a model of what not to do. The Afghan Taliban, removed from power and routed from the country by the end of 2001, needed only a few years to revive itself, owing to the failure of the Afghan government and its international backers to rebuild and stabilize the country.

A critical factor in the Taliban’s revival was the haven that it found in the distant reaches of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, and the support that it continued to receive from elements within Pakistan. This time, as the Afghan Taliban are expelled from Pakistan, NATO and Afghan forces must be ready to take them on.

Observing the fighting in Pakistan, the United States, Afghanistan, and India expect the Pakistani army to take on both the Afghan Taliban and the Pakistani militants. But thousands of fighters are thought to be dispersed in the Pashtun tribal areas of Pakistan, with many of them focused on operations in Afghanistan. The cross-border movement of radicals suggests the importance of international cooperation.

Moreover, alliances among radical groups are constantly shifting, a reflection of tribal traditions and opportunism. Outsiders watching these shifts, and the Pakistani government’s handling of them, have been unable to discern a consistent pattern that would explain Pakistani policy. But here, regional politics must be taken into account, especially the continuing rivalry between India and Pakistan.

At every stage of the lengthy conflict that has brought the US into the region, Pakistan has sought to limit Indian influence in Afghanistan. Indeed, India’s growing influence and investment in Afghanistan is disturbing to Pakistan’s national security apparatus. Ultimately, the dynamics of Afghan politics will determine Afghanistan’s fate. But a collaborative India-Pakistan effort to stabilize the country could work wonders.

For both Pakistan and India, Afghanistan risks turning into a new disputed territory, like Kashmir, where conflict has damaged both countries for more than 60 years. In Afghanistan today, they have an opportunity to reject that precedent and act on their mutual interest in stability.

Pakistan must be able to focus internally on its future. Financially insolvent and politically paralyzed, Pakistan needs international help to bring development to its liberated tribal areas and hope to the young people – 65% of the population – who live there. For India, stability in Pakistan and Afghanistan would ease its rise to global economic power. Both countries should take advantage of the opportunity for cooperation provided by the Pakistani Army’s campaign against Waziristan’s militants.

Source:project-syndicate.org