In a report that offers lessons for the growing war in Afghanistan, the inspector general overseeing Iraqi reconstruction efforts has found major flaws in the State Department's oversight of a $2.5 billion contract to help build Iraq's police force.
The State Department does not have enough people in Iraq to monitor the work or track the money being spent by DynCorp International, according to the audit issued Monday by Stuart W. Bowen Jr., the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction. One contracting officer in Iraq oversees all receipts and task orders, with no time to visit work sites or to ensure payroll accuracy. At least $1 billion in past invoices have yet to be reconciled, part of a backlog of work that State has promised for years to fix.
"We are questioning what value the government got for $2.5 billion," Bowen said in an interview.
The report said that the entire contract was "vulnerable to waste and fraud" because of the poor oversight. The State Department, in a written response, said that conclusion was "unfounded" and not substantiated in the report.
DynCorp, which provides services to the U.S. government and military in hot spots around the world, has been under contract since 2004 to support police training in Iraq and Afghanistan. The contract is the single largest in State Department history, according to the inspector general.
The price tag for Afghanistan under the contract so far is $437 million, according to State Department records. The cost of police training there is expected to soar along with the growing American military presence. Training and enlarging the Afghan national police force is a key element of the Obama administration's plan to shift security to the Kabul government and eventually allow the United States to draw down its troops.
DynCorp spokesman Douglas Ebner stressed that the report addressed only the State Department's oversight and not the company's work. "The basic point is the audit did not look at performance," Ebner said. "We are performing under the contract and we are training Iraqi police."
Story continues below
The report, one of a series of reviews of U.S. efforts in training foreign security forces, triggered swift criticism of the State Department from lawmakers who oversee wartime contracting.
"They've been managing this contract in Iraq since 2004 and, according to this report, they have no idea where any of the money went," Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), chair of a Senate subcommittee that monitors contracting. "What's even worse is that these are the same people responsible for police training in Afghanistan, so I don't have any confidence that they're doing a better job there."
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), senior Republican on the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, called the findings "simply outrageous" and illustrated "the need to move quickly and systemically to reform how the government manages federal contracts."
The State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs is responsible for overseeing the contract. In a written response to the audit, State officials said invoices were reviewed both in Iraq and Washington to prevent fraud. Nineteen percent of invoices are rejected during the Washington review, the department said.
The department acknowledged that, after a critical audit in 2007, it had promised to increase the number of contract officers in Iraq to 11. But that group remains at three people, State officials said, because of space constraints at the embassy in Baghdad.
The report released Monday is the first of two audits expected to focus on police training in Iraq by the inspector general. A joint State and Defense inspector general report of the DynCorp contract is expected by the end of the month. Multiple audits of U.S. efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan in the past years have documented waste and flaws in government oversight.
Contractors are expected to surge in number as the U.S. military increases the training of police and army in Afghanistan. According to testimony last month before the independent Commission on Wartime Contracting, the number of U.S. defense contractors in Afghanistan is expected to reach 160,000 this year, more than the number of U.S. troops.
The Defense Department is poised to take over the police training contract in Afghanistan from the State Department, a move that has been portrayed in public hearings as an attempt to accelerate training critical to an anticipated U.S. withdrawal.
The Obama administration has envisioned an Afghan army that would number 134,000 by the end of this year and grow to 240,000 in 2013. The Afghan national police currently stand at 96,800 with a proposal to expand to 160,000 by 2013, according to recent Pentagon testimony.
Training of security forces has been particularly tough in Afghanistan where, unlike Iraq, education is limited and literacy is hard to calculate. Official estimates suggest about 30 percent of the Afghan population is literate. Diplomats and military who have worked in the region believe about 10 to 20 per cent of the population can read, write and count at a sufficient level for security training.
Police recruits are decidedly less proficient than military recruits, they said, and will be particularly challenging to train. "Afghanistan is not Iraq," one general told the wartime contracting commission during a hearing in December.
Auditors who recently traveled to Iraq described the oversight of DynCorp's police training support as "extremely weak. " Invoice review, property control, and lease negotiations were all problematic, they said. Invoices were stuffed in boxes without review, auditors said, and thousands of timesheets were found not signed by supervisors or employees.
One staffer whose job was to approve purchase orders was found in November 2009 to have a backlog of over 700 orders, according to the report.
State's contract officers also negotiated storage, land and housing facilities at excessive rates, auditors said. In one instance cited in the report, the State representative and DynCorp prepared a lease agreement for land at a cost that was seven times what the U.S. embassy considered the going rate.
Source:huffingtonpost.com/
Afghan Twitter,Afghanistan news, information, and news archives.collection of news related to Afghanistan from various news, An excellent source of News about Afghanistan. Afghanistan news service,Local News from Afghanistan,at,Afghan Twitter
Showing posts with label PRESIDENT OBAMA MAJOR PROBLEMS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PRESIDENT OBAMA MAJOR PROBLEMS. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
AFGHANISTAN AND IRAN CAUSING PRESIDENT OBAMA MAJOR PROBLEMS
As you may know, President Obama will address the nation Tuesday night, telling the world he will send more troops to Afghanistan but also that he'll demand the Karzai government stop the massive corruption going on over there.
I mean, we simply cannot have American service people dying so Afghan war lords can sell heroin.
Tuesday night at West Point, the president will try to sell the world that the Afghan war is an international cause, but that's a joke. A few nations are fighting, but very few.
Once again, the USA is carrying the heavy load against the Taliban terrorists and their Al Qaeda pals.
The weakness of the world is also what's driving the Iranian mullahs. As predicted, Iran is defying the United Nations, saying it will not cooperate with inspectors trying to inhibit the mullahs from building nuclear weapons. After years of BS, the U.N. has finally voted to censure Iran, greatly amusing the mullahs who could not care less.
So President Obama is looking at a bad situation in Afghanistan and a worse scenario in Iran as he again tries to rally the world to help out.
In its lead editorial Monday, The Wall Street Journal says: "Until the president, his advisers and the Europeans realize that only punitive sanctions or military strikes will force [Iran] to reconsider its nuclear ambitions, an emboldened Islamic republic will continue to march confidently toward a bomb, over Barack Obama's best intentions."
The very liberal New York Times has also editorialized: "There is no military solution here. But Iran's repressive leaders cannot be allowed to threaten the rest of the world with a nuclear weapon."
The Times believes international pressure and sanctions will stop the mullahs. I do not believe that. Only a naval blockade that drastically limits Iran from importing goods might bring the Iranians around.
President Obama is positioning himself as a negotiator, and that's fine up to a point. The worst thing the USA could do is to start yet another fight without exhausting all other options.
But as Stratfor reports, the Iranian mullahs, Putin and others believe the president is weak and therefore will continue to defy him until something changes.
Iraq and Afghanistan have taken a huge toll on America, especially on the military and their families. We are not in a position of strength right now.
Source:foxnews.com
I mean, we simply cannot have American service people dying so Afghan war lords can sell heroin.
Tuesday night at West Point, the president will try to sell the world that the Afghan war is an international cause, but that's a joke. A few nations are fighting, but very few.
Once again, the USA is carrying the heavy load against the Taliban terrorists and their Al Qaeda pals.
The weakness of the world is also what's driving the Iranian mullahs. As predicted, Iran is defying the United Nations, saying it will not cooperate with inspectors trying to inhibit the mullahs from building nuclear weapons. After years of BS, the U.N. has finally voted to censure Iran, greatly amusing the mullahs who could not care less.
So President Obama is looking at a bad situation in Afghanistan and a worse scenario in Iran as he again tries to rally the world to help out.
In its lead editorial Monday, The Wall Street Journal says: "Until the president, his advisers and the Europeans realize that only punitive sanctions or military strikes will force [Iran] to reconsider its nuclear ambitions, an emboldened Islamic republic will continue to march confidently toward a bomb, over Barack Obama's best intentions."
The very liberal New York Times has also editorialized: "There is no military solution here. But Iran's repressive leaders cannot be allowed to threaten the rest of the world with a nuclear weapon."
The Times believes international pressure and sanctions will stop the mullahs. I do not believe that. Only a naval blockade that drastically limits Iran from importing goods might bring the Iranians around.
President Obama is positioning himself as a negotiator, and that's fine up to a point. The worst thing the USA could do is to start yet another fight without exhausting all other options.
But as Stratfor reports, the Iranian mullahs, Putin and others believe the president is weak and therefore will continue to defy him until something changes.
Iraq and Afghanistan have taken a huge toll on America, especially on the military and their families. We are not in a position of strength right now.
Source:foxnews.com
Labels:
PRESIDENT OBAMA MAJOR PROBLEMS
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)